Skip to content Skip to navigation

State Sovereignty Cannot Be Legitimately Invoked to Attack the Independence of UN Experts and Undermine Established Terms of Reference for Fact-finding Missions

June 9, 2017

FIDH-HRIC Statement
Human Rights Council 35th Session
Item 3: Interactive Dialogue with the Special Rapporteur on extreme poverty
Delivered by Sharon Hom, June 8, 2017


Thank you, Mr. President,

This statement is delivered by FIDH together with its member organization Human Rights in China.

We welcome the probing, balanced, and constructive China mission report by the Special Rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights, and note its clear acknowledgment of China’s progress in its development efforts.

But the Special Rapporteur also stresses that while development and human rights are mutually reinforcing, they are not synonymous. In assessing these achievements within a human rights framework, he underscores that the greatest challenge is “to understand how the leading role of the Communist Party can coexist with the recognition of individual rights and the provision of meaningful accountability mechanisms . . . .” (para.16) This key point is critical in light of China’s rejection of judicial independence and the rule of law as harmful “Western” concepts.

As the Report highlights, China’s top-down policy approach structurally excludes the meaningful participation of civil society and affected groups, with “little room for civil society organizations that are critical of the government’s approach.” (para. 32)  This marginalization is exacerbated by an intensified targeting of independent citizen actions and defenders, including prominent rights defense lawyer Jiang Tianyong, whom the Special Rapporteur did meet with on his mission. Jiang was disappeared for six months before being charged with “subversion of state power.”

Jiang is a pillar in the kind of work that—as highlighted by the Special Rapporteur—contributes to stability, rather than conflicts with its preservation (para. 75). Member states must call for the release of Jiang and others being punished for their rights defense work, and reject the criminalization of their legitimate exercise of rights protected by Chinese and international law. State sovereignty cannot be legitimately invoked to attack the independence of UN experts and undermine established Terms of Reference for fact-finding missions.

Mr. Special Rapporteur, what steps can member states take to support and build on your recommendations, including through their bilateral engagement and technical cooperation with China, and to ensure that all international cooperation and engagement are consistent with international human rights obligations and standards?

Related Resources

UN Special Rapporteur on extreme poverty & human rights: Philip Alston

  • Final report (March 2017): EN, CH
  • End-of-mission statement on China visit (August 2016): EN, CH

Explore Topics

709 Crackdown Access to Information Access to Justice Administrative Detention All about law Arbitrary Detention
Asset Transparency Bilateral Dialogue Black Jail Book Review Business And Human Rights Censorship
Charter 08 Children Chinese Law Circumvention technology Citizen Activism Citizen Journalists
Citizen Participation Civil Society Commentary Communist Party Of China Constitution Consumer Safety
Contending views Corruption Counterterrorism Courageous Voices Cultural Revolution Culture Matters
Current affairs Cyber Security Daily Challenges Democratic And Political Reform Demolition And Relocation  Dissidents
Education Elections Enforced Disappearance Environment Ethnic Minorities EU-China
Family Planning Farmers Freedom of Association Freedom of Expression Freedom of Press Freedom of Religion
Government Accountability Government regulation Government transparency Hong Kong House Arrest HRIC Translation
Hukou Human Rights Council Human rights developments Illegal Search And Detention Inciting Subversion Of State Power Information Control 
Information technology Information, Communications, Technology (ICT) International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) International Human Rights International perspective International Relations
Internet Internet Governance JIansanjiang lawyers' rights defense Judicial Reform June Fourth Kidnapping
Labor Camps Labor Rights Land, Property, Housing Lawyer's rights Lawyers Legal System
Letters from the Mainland Major Event (Environment, Food Safety, Accident, etc.) Mao Zedong Microblogs (Weibo) National People's Congress (NPC) New Citizens Movement
Non-Governmental Organization (NGO) Olympics One country, two systems Online Activism Open Government Information Personal stories
Police Brutality Political commentary Political Prisoner Politics Prisoner Of Conscience Probing history
Propaganda Protests And Petitions Public Appeal Public Security Racial Discrimination Reeducation-Through-Labor
Rights Defenders Rights Defense Rule Of Law Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) Special Topic State compensation
State Secrets State Security Subversion Of State Power Surveillance Technology Thoughts/Theories
Tiananmen Mothers Tibet Torture Typical cases United Nations US-China 
Uyghurs, Uighurs Vulnerable Groups Women Youth Youth Perspective